Take the NASA space shuttle of 1986 for example. On that day, a space shuttle exploded. And it's not like anybody didn't know either, the engineers had seen errors in the system but were completely ignored, causing the death of the person inside.
this is another example of people giving out warnings. But instead of people giving warnings, it is the climate giving warnings. The permafrost is melting, giving way to deceased plants and animals that are increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere by 2x. Glaciers are melting and the sea level is rising because of this. More and more natural disasters are happening. Yet no one decides to do something about it. What do you think about these reoccurring instances of warnings and ignorance? What do you think people could do to make warnings seem more disastrous? Tell me in the comments.

I do agree that sometimes people let things filter through their brains, and occasionally important information is lost. I think that in order for warnings to be taken more seriously, the person giving the warning really has to come in with some evidence that cannot be ignored. The problem that Cassandra had was that she couldn't give the people any proof, because saying that she can see into the future isn't very believable, so likewise, they didn't believe her.
ReplyDeleteI agree 100% on the fact that people sometimes hear information, and choose to ignore it because it doesn't follow what they believe in. If no one decides to believe in what's going on with our climate right now, there will be effects on our planet that are irreversible. This would be much worse than a few people dying on an Spacecraft. hundreds of thousands or millions of people could die to global warming. We need to take action to help our planet.
ReplyDelete